Welcome Back!

You have Gifts for Good in your basket.

Welcome Back!

Last time you were here, you were looking to help vulnerable children and families. Your support can save and change lives.

When will our regulators step in and end industry self-regulation when it comes to our online privacy? Selfregulation will not protect our privacy and most importantly it will not protect the privacy of our children. Across 2022, we have seen some world leading examples of poor data management by corporate Australia. The private sector has…

December 15, 2022

Do more to protect our kids

When will our regulators step in and end industry self-regulation when it comes to our online privacy? Selfregulation will not protect our privacy and most importantly it will not protect the privacy of our children.

Across 2022, we have seen some world leading examples of poor data management by corporate Australia.

The private sector has been trusted to safeguard our privacy and it’s safe to say they failed. But what did we learn from the experience?

Just last month industry codes designed largely by big tech were submitted to the eSafety Commissioner for consideration.

These codes are required to protect the safety of our children online.

They will not succeed.

Some may find it unsurprising that the very same industry that profits from children’s data have chosen to design codes that result in unacceptably lower standards of protection for children in Australia, than protection set in many other jurisdictions around the world.

Australia should be the safest place in the world to go online but it’s not. The UK, Ireland and even in the home of big tech, California, they have put in place regulators to draft codes rather than trusting industry.

The codes drafted in these regions have some clear differences.

When children register for an account overseas, the default setting is ‘Private’ until 18. In Australia, industry has set the age at 16, offering greater opportunities to commercially exploit young people.

In another example, overseas GPS location default settings in under 18 accounts are ‘Must not Collect’. At home the setting is ‘Must not Broadcast’ meaning the collection of historic locations can be collected for those 16 years and under.

The third and perhaps most concerning development in these codes is the attempt by the tech sector to somewhat sidestep mandatory reporting requirements on child sexual exploitation material legislated in NSW, Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania and the Northern Territory.

The question here is why should our community hold big tech to a lower standard than small businesses, clubs and childcare centres?

Furthermore, Australians don’t believe that the new industry codes pass the pub test. YouGov polling found that 71 per cent of Australian adults did not trust the social media industry to draft codes.

And 73 per cent said they would prefer regulators to draft codes around children’s online safety.

We are calling on the Albanese Government and the eSafety Commissioner to take control and protect our children. We must question the self-interest of the private sector. The future of Australia’s youth is at stake.

Margaret Sheehan is CEO of ChildFund Australia

Daily Telegraph, Sydney 14/12/2022